Banks are important in any ultramodern profitable system. As a structuralists one may regard banks as a central organ of our society similar as heart faucets that pumps clean blood into our highways. Their omnipotence also stems from their capability to collect and store guests’ fiscal data. Banks can also work this data to come verifiers of our individualities similar evidence of address, evidence of income, evidence of cash balance, and evidence of identity. thus, calculating becomes central to ultramodern banking and tech companies and originators now fancy that lets just take over the entire banking function in the name of “Fintech”. One prodigy that can Big Tech and tech originators actually replace or make banks vanish (just like coal mines or sword manufactories in the UK). Let’s look the challenge of Fintech. Here I would briefly describe the mixture of technology with finance or fintech.

 Fintech or TechFin

 The first challenge is to define fintech, the indication is in the name. enterprises that were traditionally engaged in deposit taking, payments, lending, insurance, or brokerage businesses and now they use technology to perform analogous operation may be labelled as Fintech (). enterprises that are traditionally in the IT business similar as Apple, Google, Samsung, Amazon, or other Big Tech when they try to give traditional services using their technologies to their guests may be defined as “TechFin”. This contradiction is confused that everything indeed a website immolation advice on buying bitcoin now have started to call itself a FinTech. It’s the ultimate that’s challenging the former in some aspects of their operations not the other way around. Because the realities being challenged are so big and mesmerizing in their functions, it’s fashionable to allude every incipiency as a FinTech.

 Whereas some startups are nothing further than a premonitory website offering purchase suggestions or make investors opinion. Other startups are bare tech native enterprises who try to work their IT capabilities and give one or two fiscal services similar as Klarna (buy now pay latterly).

 Fintech and TechFin

 Fintech an emergent challenge to banks

Witchcraft of Banks We need to understand their “Raw Material”, “force”, and “wares”, which banks use to produce or manufacture their products and services. Banks use plutocrat that they produce using guests’ “Depositors” and “advance or invest” to other people, enterprises, and governments. In another thread, I ’ll explain that banks can neither take deposits nor make loan or investments, it’s against the law. thus, banks’ products are of four types

 Conventional Banking

 These are the conditioning that involve operation of banks’ balance distance(plutocrat) similar as underwriting, insurance, and portfolio operation. These products calculate on a bank’s balance distance as banks would have to recognize their commitment and pay if a counter party to any agreement defaults. Imagine, you take a long-forward position in a currency exchange agreement and bank arranges the exchange between you another counter party. When the times comes, and the counter party now struggles to give you the currency, in this case, the bank takes the responsibility and settles the exchange.

 Also, if you ’re a company and has just blazoned an IPO of 1 million units@$ 50 each stock and bank has agreed to capitalize it if the full stock isn’t vended and the price falls below$ 30. On day of launch, if the request price is$ 30 but only half million- stock sell, also the bank will buy the remaining stock at$ 30 from you. These types of conditioning bear deep balance wastes and capability to absorb large losses.

 Platform Banking

 These are the conditioning that involve operation of banks coffers and moxie similar as premonitory, transfer of plutocrat, conversion of currency, and price comparison. These services are bare premonitory services and bear nothing but an escrow account to settle payments and, in some cases, they need not have an escrow account indeed. enterprises similar as marketer, INSHUR, Experian, Credit Karma, Wise, and Revolute has escrow account at large banks and they give services as plutocrat exchange, currency conversion, plutocrat transfer, trading, or indeed insurance offers. But they do not hold your deposit or advance you any plutocrat, they’re just central. Other services providers similar as Credit Air use data handed by banks to request fiscal and insurance products. They don’t offer anything but information and platform.

 Structure Baking

 These are the conditioning where banks work their physical, IT and on-physical structure to serve the requirements of society similar as trafficker payments, online payments, secure set- up of direct disbenefits or indeed an escrow account to hold plutocrat. BigTech enterprises are fiercely fighting in this arena, PayPal, Apple Pay, Samsung Pay, Amazon, Mastercard, and Visa are each in this business. In fact, banks also use master card and visa to offer their payment services; still, still the front is their name rather than factual technology providers.

 Warehousing and clearing banking

 These are the conditioning that may be called “High Finance”. These sits at the top of the fiscal system and world frugality and they give the capability to settle all sale in the domestic and global fiscal system. SWIFT technology and Bank of International Settlement are the pivots around which this works. Although, bitcoin and other crypto tried to come a trouble; nonetheless, the fort is too strong to break in.

 Data Banking

 These conditioning are the now a hotly queried area in our ultramodern society where the fiscal world is fighting hard to capture as important data as possible about guests. Their shopping station, their consumption geste, their saving geste, and their trip, rest and pleasure geste. These data points are also used by banks and other fintech (which pierce them through open banking) to knitter products and services for their guests.

Conclusion

 The below discussion establishes that FinTech or TechFin either complement being banks or competes in some special aspects of banking conditioning. The real question is that making claims similar as Banks can be replaced or excluded altogether is a far cry. What may be that these FinTech or TechFin ultimately either come banks or may either be taken over by banks. We don’t know, but in the coming composition I’ll explain that why banks are delicate to replace.